Government & public sector

KNOWBEFORETHECRISISTELLSYOU

A continuous, anonymous, weekly population-level signal on youth wellbeing. Built to complement MHCYP and APMS, not replace them. Designed for OSR-grade scrutiny from day one.

Request the compliance packSee Poyntr Pulse
Continuous youth-MH signalweekly aggregates · designed against the Code of Practice for Statistics
UK sovereign hostingLondon region · per-user envelope encryption · UK-resident keys
Aggregate onlyminimum cell size 50 · k-anonymity · differential privacy ε = 1.0
Auditable end-to-endHMAC-chained access log · SIEM-exportable · documented DPIA

The reality

The numbers don’t move. And no-one is measuring.

One in five children in England has a probable mental disorder. Hundreds of thousands are waiting for a first appointment. The most recent national wave was published in November 2023.

In every classroom of thirty

20.3% of 8-to-16-year-olds in England had a probable mental disorder in 2023.

NHS England, Mental Health of Children and Young People Wave 4 · published 21 November 2023.

78,577

children waited over a year for CAMHS treatment in 2023/24.

385,540

were still waiting for first contact at end-March 2025.

NHS England · CYPMHS Waiting Times 2023/24 · CYP MH long-read, March 2025.

Measurement cadence

Five publication points in nine years. The most recent is from 2023.

NHS England’s Mental Health of Children and Young People Survey is the gold-standard prevalence study. Since 2020 it has been published as annual follow-up waves to the 2017 baseline. The most recent wave is now two and a half years old, with no successor published.

2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
MHCYPannual since 2020 (latest 2023)
MHCYP baseline2017 fieldwork
Wave 12020
Wave 22021
Wave 32022
Wave 42023 (most recent)
same nine years, same children
Pulsecontinuous, every week
5 publication points · most recent 2½ years ago~480 weekly signals · zero gap

Pulse is a complement, not a replacement. MHCYP remains the gold-standard prevalence study; Pulse fills the years between waves, and the months after.

How we work together

Start with one question. Scale to the country.

Each step builds on the last. Every step is independently exit-able. You choose how far to go, and on what evidence.

One intervention

Did the rollout actually work?

Pick one policy intervention. We measure whether it changed outcomes in the institutions that received it, against matched controls. Results in months, not years. The easiest place to start.

The easiest place to start.
One programme

Young Futures Hubs, measured from day one

Continuous wellbeing measurement across all 8 early-adopter authorities (Nottingham, Tower Hamlets, County Durham, Manchester, Birmingham, Brighton & Hove, Bristol, Leeds), then onward to the 50 by 2029. Same framework everywhere, real-time outcomes.

One region

A wellbeing dashboard for your authority

Aggregated intelligence across every youth-serving institution in your area. Trend data, benchmarking, early warning. The Families First Partnership pathfinders are natural early partners. No individual student data ever leaves the school.

The country

A continuous national indicator

Poyntr Pulse as a published, accredited national indicator. Open API, transparent methodology, OSR-grade documentation. Cited in parliamentary committees, departmental analysis, and commissioning decisions. Complement to MHCYP, not a replacement.

Honest by design

What Pulse does, and what it will never do

01

We publish.

Methodology, k-anonymity threshold, differential-privacy parameter, suppression rules, every change to any of them. All open, all dated, all version-controlled.

We don’t sell access.

Population statistics drawn from coaching data are a public good. They will not be sold to advertisers, insurers, employers, or hedge funds.

02

We aggregate.

You see the shape of a region, an age band, an institution type. The minimum cell size is 50 people, well above GSS administrative-data baselines. Smaller, we suppress.

We don’t profile.

No individual student is ever identifiable from a Pulse figure. No re-identification by joining datasets. No targeting of a school, a postcode, or a child by anyone, ever.

03

We measure.

Whether the policy you funded changed outcomes for the children it was funded for, in the institutions it reached, on a cadence that lets you adjust before the next election cycle.

We don’t replace clinical judgement.

Pulse complements MHCYP and APMS. It is not a diagnosis, not a referral instrument, not a substitute for the clinicians and DSLs who hold statutory responsibility for the child in front of them.

This isn’t a procurement promise.

It’s how the system is built.

What we won’t repeat

Public trust is hard-won. The receipts are public record.

Every UK govtech failure has the same lineage: a programme designed for one purpose, an architecture that allowed creep into another, a delayed regulator finding, a quiet cancellation. Each architectural choice in Pulse is built directly against one of these.

Procurement readiness

What we’ve built. Not what we’re hoping to.

Every commitment below is in the live codebase today. We do not list certifications we have not earned, frameworks we are not yet listed on, or accreditations we have not yet pursued. Ask us in the briefing where we are with each.

Per-user envelope encryptionUK GDPR Article 32

A separate key for every person.

Each user’s coaching data is encrypted with a per-user data-encryption key, derived in a hardware security module from a tenant key-encryption key. Keys live in a UK-region key management service.

Tamper-evident audit logNCSC Cyber Assessment Framework

Every access, hash-chained.

Each audit log entry is HMAC-chained to the one before it, so any tampering breaks the chain. The chain is exportable to your SIEM in a documented format.

Crypto-shred erasureUK GDPR Article 17

Right to erasure, made real.

Messages, memories, voice, journal entries. We destroy the per-user encryption key, which makes the data permanently unreadable. No undelete. No backup loophole.

UK data residencyUK GDPR Chapter V

Data stays in the UK region.

Application services run in London (europe-west2). The key management service runs in europe-west3 (Frankfurt) for envelope-encryption operations only. No transatlantic data transfer for child data.

Aggregation disciplineUKSA EAP215 · ONS small-number suppression

Cells of fewer than 50, suppressed.

Population statistics use a minimum cell size of 50, well above the GSS administrative-data baseline of k=5–10 and above ONS small-number suppression thresholds. Differential privacy is applied at ε = 1.0, the conservative end of the published range.

Open methodologyOSR Code of Practice

Documented for OSR-grade scrutiny.

Methodology, sources, limitations, and disclosure controls are version-controlled and published. Any change is dated. Designed against the Code of Practice for Statistics from day one.

Get in touch

This isn’t a proposal. It’s a system, already running.

We will share the full data governance pack, the published methodology, our DPIA template, and a working dashboard tailored to the question you most want answered.

Request a briefing

[email protected]